7
Volume l #6 November 1992
EPHRAIM'S FORUM
For those who are of Ephraim, holding the rights
and responsibilities of the kingdom, this is your
forum; to pursue remedy for our ills, and
accomplish the bringing forth of Zion.
HOW EPHRAIM FUNCTIONS
EPHRAIM ECONOMICS
Inheritances ............ A Place For Posterity
The law of God is very family
oriented, indeed, the kingdom of God is family government from one end of the
spectrum to the other. This is
especially manifest in inheritances, land and properties that pass from one
family generation to another.
An everlasting inheritance can only
be received pursuant to the laws of God, by consecration. "Consecrations were made to God, not to
the bishop or to the society. ... If all wealth and property were conse-crated
to the bishop, he would then own and controle the wealth of soci-ety. This would foster priestcraft and a
socialistic order. But by the Saints
consecrating their wealth to God, the bishop was made a servant both of God and
the people. ... Such a procedure assured that both the bishop and the
individual would be responsible agents under God, rather than mere
pawns of society. It was significant
that the Saints were to consecrate their property to the Lord with a
"covenant and a deed" that could not be broken. ... Each stewardship
was to be deeded to the indi-vidual steward and secured to him legally, by the
law of the land. ... Concerning inheritances [Joseph to Edward Partridge], you
are bound by the law of the land, to give a deed, securing to him who receives
in-heritances, his inheritance, for an everlasting inheritance, or in other
words, to be his individual property, his private stewardship. And if he is found a transgressor and should
be cut off, out of the church, his inheritance is his still, and he is
delivered over to the buffetings of Satan, till the day of redemption. But the property which he conse-crated ...
he cannot obtain again by the law of the Lord.
Thus you see the propriety of this law, that rich men cannot have the
power to dis-inherit the poor by obtaining again that which they have
consecrated, which is the residue, signified in the law." (Doctrines of the Kingdom, pages 229-234)
There was no guess work, or chances
to take, more than exist in any undertaking.
When you gave your wealth you did it with a deed, you gave it away; when
the bishop gave you an inheritance, consisting of lands and properties, he did
it with a deed, he gave it.
We believe in the literal
restoration of the House (race, lineage, nation, family) of Israel. For this to come about there must be: l)
a people descended from Israel, and 2) a place, an
"everlasting in-heritance".
An inheritance cannot be bought or sold but passes to
1
one's posterity, one's family. With an inability to lose the land comes the inability to become
slaves. With everyone having their
inheritance there is no place to build mega-factories or businesses or to
speculate upon, etc. Big business is
out and small business is in; the balance God wishes exists. "The Good Earth" portrays how
interconnected we are with the land. To
buy and sell land is only a step above buying and selling people, because
without land men are reduced to slavery.
The Indians referred to the earth as our "Mother" and
certainly we must feed at her breast.
The injustices we suffer, she also suffers, and when she is carved,
butchered and sold, we feed, as it were, upon our very flesh and blood.
Production
The most efficient form of
production, contrary to popular mass-media produced belief, is small
business. People whose vocation
requires them to exercise both their mental and physical powers are more
capable of seeing and understanding the principles through which the heavens
and earth are governed; it is by tapping into those principles, or keys of
knowledge, that productivity, or creativity flows. It is worthy of note that the protestants of
France, humble followers of Christ, known as Huguenots were, "...
considered quite ordinary; shopkeepers, craftsmen, tradesmen, small
employers. Only a few were of the
higher or lower class." (Days of
the Upright, page ___) With small
business there is a unity of capital and labor, therefore unity in government. When capital and labor are divided the
government is racked with legislation stacked up like tinker toys, each faction
trying to get something over on the other; in so doing small business is
systematically destroyed.
The United Order, as designated by
God, is in reality a partnership of individuals wherein the "faithful and
wise" are joined together, and the "unfaithful and unwise" are
"removed". (see D & C
104:70-77) In a partnership men get
together and check their resources, physical and mental; they reshuffle things
some and set every partner over some department, all working together in unity;
this is the United Order.
Every man in his department or
stewardship, the lands and the build-ings, the tools and equipment, supplies,
etc., are between him and God,
a sacred trust which no man has a right to interfere
with; such are stewardships. If a
partner pulls or is kicked out his stewardship goes with him.
Consumption
The housing, clothing, and feeding
on one's family is what drives men to produce or provide. To become as one family, providing for one
an-other, is the needed mind-set for a United Order.
There are many men who are
extremely productive but also spend-thrifts.
Only by determining equal portions per family can the dis-position to squander
be arrested and at the same time have the binding effect that justice always
creates. Like an allowance given to
children
2
who are then allowed to indulge themselves, as they
will. Equality isn't the same amount,
or thing, but an equal chance to have that which we desire, which will be
according to our circumstances, our wants, and our needs.
Distribution ............ The Lord's Storehouse
The storehouse supplants Banks,
Insurance Companies, and Mercantiles of all types. What it amounts to is a consolidation of the fantastic panorama
of distribution as we know it, virtually eliminating the mid-dlemen. An example of this can be seen in the system
employed by the ancient Incas. "It
was impossible - in the judgment of a high Spanish authority to improve on the
system of distribution, so carefully was it accommodated to the condition and
comfort of the artisan. ... A part of the agricultural produce and manufactures
... [were deposited] in maga-zines, whose design was to supply the people in
seasons of scarcity, and occasionally to furnish relief to individuals whom
sickness or misfor-tune had reduced ... These magazines were found by the
Spaniards, on their arrival, stored with ... every article of luxury or use
within the compass of Peruvian skill.
The magazines of grain, in particular, would frequently have sufficed
for the consumption of the adjoining district for several years. [Continuing on] If no man could become rich in Peru, no man could become
poor. No spendthrift could waste his
sub-stance in riotous luxury. No
adventurous schemer could impoverish his family by the spirit of
speculation. ... No mendicant was
tolerated in Peru. When a man was
reduced by poverty or misfortune (it could hardly be by fault), the arm of the
law was stretched out to minister relief; not the stinted relief of private
charity, nor that which is doled out drop by drop, as it were, from the frozen
reservoirs of "the parish",
but in generous measure, bringing no humiliation to the object of it, and placing
him on a level with the rest of his countrymen. [Going back] Occupation
was found for all, from the child five years old to the aged matron not too
infirm to hold the distaff. No one, at
least none but the decrepit and sick, was allowed to eat the bread of idleness
in Peru. Idleness was a crime in the
eye of the law, and, as such, severely punished; while industry was publicly
commended and stimulated by rewards. ... the task of apportioning the labor was
assigned to local authorities, and great care was taken that it should not fall
dispropor-tionately on any."
(Conquest of Peru Vol. I, pages 56-63)
The Counterfeit .............. or Fallacy
There have been, and now are, many
attempts at the Lord's Economics, having all things common; from Christians to
Hippies to, worst of all, atheists.
None have succeeded in embracing that law of God that has been referred
to, but all have fallen prey to this one single fallacy.
Among the atheistic Communists
there is a saying: "From every man
according to his ability, and to every man according to his need." It is a noble saying and true; unfortunately
its truth is used to lure man into an indescribable horror chamber. How can any man produce according
3
to his ability when he must comply with someone over
him? Someone jea-lous of his position
and therefore resentful of anyone who excels.
In Russia and China those who produced according to their ability, that
had ability, simply dug their own graves.
In such a system, incompetence reigns supreme. With the lack of production brings an inability to provide for
needs. And as for distribution ... tons
of food sat and rotted while millions starved.
Although these are extremes, the principle has been the same in every
attempt to live God's law of economics, even among the latter-Day Saints.
For "Under Communism
(Christian or otherwise) a business cannot go bankrupt because the community,
... is compelled to bear the cost of mismanagement - to pay for what is done
that should not be done, [and vice versa] ... a condition which, in a
competitive economy, soon corrects itself, and not at the expense of the
community, but at the expense of whoever supplies the capital. ... for a blind
blockhead can make more mistakes in an hour than a capable man can unravel in a
week. In a competitive economy,
mediocrity bankrupts itself or the sponser; under Communism, or monopolistic
Capitalism, mediocrity bankrupts the community." (Thugs and Communists, pages 95-96)
The fallacy in a nutshell is
irresponsibility; when men are not liable to be called on to give an accounting.